At a glance
- LL-37 is a 37-amino-acid peptide cleaved from the end of the human cathelicidin antimicrobial protein (hCAP18); it plays a role in defense against microbes, wound closure and new blood vessel formation. [6] [7]
- In wound treatment, only forms applied to the wound have been studied: in the first study of 34 people the lowest concentration was favorable, and the 148-person phase 2b study found no benefit in the whole patient group. Published human data with injection are a single melanoma case in which it was given into the tumor. [1] [2]
- In psoriasis and lupus, LL-37 takes part in mechanisms that feed inflammation and the autoimmune response. [4] [5]
- The FDA writes that it does not have enough safety information to know whether LL-37 would harm humans. [8]
- There is no licensed product in Türkiye. [12]
- This guide gives no dose, method-of-use or product-sourcing information.
What is LL-37?
On the first line of defense against microbes, the human body produces short protein fragments called “antimicrobial peptides”. Cathelicidins are a branch of this family. According to a 2018 review, LL-37 is the peptide cleaved from the end portion of the human cathelicidin antimicrobial protein (CAMP, hCAP18); it increases resistance to microbes, recruits immune cells to the site of inflammation, and supports wound closure and new blood vessel formation. The same review also describes that cathelicidin production in human macrophages is increased in a vitamin D-dependent manner. [6]
That it is a peptide the body makes itself does not mean that LL-37 given from outside is safe or beneficial. As will be seen below, the same properties of LL-37 also feed inflammation and the autoimmune response in some diseases.
What did human wound-healing studies show?
Human data on LL-37 in wound treatment amount to three randomized studies with products applied to chronic wounds that do not heal.
| Study | In whom, how | What was found, what the limit is |
|---|---|---|
| Grönberg et al., 2014 | 34 people with hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers; first human study; 3-week placebo run-in, then 4 weeks of double-blind LL-37 (three concentrations) or placebo, 4-week follow-up | The healing rate constant was about six times that of placebo at the lowest concentration (p=0.003) and about three times at the middle concentration (p=0.088, not significant). Mean ulcer area shrank by 68% and 50% in these two groups. The highest concentration did not differ from placebo. No local or general safety problem was seen. The institution with which the first author is affiliated is the research unit of a pharmaceutical company. [1] |
| Mahlapuu et al., 2021 (HEAL LL-37) | Multicenter, 148 patients; mean age 67.6; median ulcer duration 20.3 months; LL-37 at two concentrations or placebo in addition to compression therapy; phase 2b, double-blind | No significant difference in healing was found between LL-37 and placebo in the whole patient group. In wounds of at least 10 cm², some healing indicators were significantly better, but this was a post hoc (not pre-planned) subgroup analysis. Both concentrations were well tolerated. Three of the authors were employees of the company developing LL-37 under the name ropocamptide. [2] |
| Miranda et al., 2023 | 25 patients with mildly infected diabetic foot ulcers in Indonesia (13 LL-37, 12 placebo); cream twice weekly for 4 weeks; double-blind | The increase in granulation tissue was greater in the LL-37 group on days 7, 14, 21 and 28. There was no significant difference between groups in inflammatory markers (IL-1α, TNF-α) and aerobic bacterial count. Conducted with university funding. [3] |
This table shows that the promising result of the first small study was not replicated in the larger study. In the first study, 34 people were divided into four groups, and at the highest concentration no improvement different from placebo was seen. [1] In the phase 2b study, the mean wound size at randomization was 11.6 cm². [2] The authors of the HEAL LL-37 study write that the possible benefit in large ulcers can only be tested with a new study adequately powered for this patient group. [2] The diabetic foot study was done with only 25 patients and measured intermediate indicators such as granulation tissue instead of complete closure. [3] In all three studies, LL-37 was applied to the wound; the results cannot be carried over to injection or oral use.
What are injection and general-use claims based on?
That LL-37 has been prepared and sold for human use is also in official records: in a 2020 warning letter, the FDA found that a compounding pharmacy was preparing drugs with numerous peptides, including LL-37, that are not on the list of bulk substances pharmacies may use and had not been nominated, and that products that must be sterile were prepared under unhygienic conditions, that is, may have been contaminated. [10] None of the three studies above examined use by injection. According to the FDA’s assessment dated April 22, 2026, the FDA does not have enough safety information to know whether LL-37 would harm humans when given to them. [8]
The published human experience in which LL-37 was given by injection is from the cancer field: in the US, LL-37 was injected directly into tumors in melanoma patients with skin metastases. In a case report published from this study, in a 63-year-old woman who had not responded to previous treatments, the treated lesions shrank during 8 weeks of injections; however, about 45 days after treatment started, numerous wart-like eruptions and a blistering lesion, at first glance suggesting skin cancer or inflamed keratosis, developed on the trunk and arms. Biopsies showed dense inflammation with atypical cell proliferation; the lesions regressed within 2 months after treatment was stopped. [7] This single case is not safety data for use in healthy people; it only shows that the peptide can provoke strong immune reactions in the skin.
What is the relationship with autoimmune diseases and cancer?
Against claims presenting LL-37 as a “harmless, natural peptide”, there are laboratory and patient-sample studies showing it in the mechanism of autoimmune diseases. These studies examine the LL-37 the body makes itself and do not show that LL-37 given from outside starts autoimmune disease. What they show is the side of LL-37 that feeds inflammation and the autoimmune response in these diseases.
Psoriasis
Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in the immune system normally do not react to the body’s own DNA. A study published in 2007 showed that in psoriasis, LL-37 binds the body’s own DNA released from damaged cells and forms dense clusters, and that these clusters trigger strong interferon production in dendritic cells. According to the authors, this pathway can sustain autoimmunity in psoriasis by breaking natural tolerance to one’s own DNA. [4]
Lupus
In the blood of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, complexes formed from antimicrobial peptides coming from web-like structures released by neutrophils (NETs) and the person’s own DNA were detected; these activated dendritic cells. Patients had developed autoantibodies against both DNA and these peptides, and the neutrophils of lupus patients released more NETs than those of healthy people. [5] Two authors of this study hold a patent on substances that block the LL-37-mediated immune response. [5]
Cancer
According to the 2018 review, LL-37 shows tumor-promoting effects in ovarian, lung, breast, prostate and pancreatic cancers and in melanoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, while it shows anticancer effects in colon, stomach and blood cancers and in oral squamous cell carcinoma; the effect varies by tissue. [6] The FDA also writes that nonclinical findings suggest that LL-37 may promote tumor formation in some tissues and may have harmful effects on male reproductive health. [8] These findings rest on laboratory and animal studies; the relationship between externally given LL-37 and cancer has not been examined in humans.
Legal status: FDA, WADA and Türkiye
US: category 2 and the advisory committee
The FDA places substances nominated for use in drugs prepared in pharmacies (compounded) that may present significant safety risks in “category 2”. LL-37 was in this category. On the FDA page dated April 22, 2026, “cathelicidin LL-37” has been moved to the table of substances whose nomination was withdrawn by the nominators. The FDA’s reasoning in the same row: compounded drugs containing LL-37 may carry a risk of immune response with some routes of administration, peptide-related impurities and characterization of the bulk substance may be complex, safety information in humans is insufficient, and nonclinical findings suggest harm to male reproductive health and the possibility of promoting tumor formation in some tissues. [8]
According to the FDA’s announcement dated April 15, 2026, the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) will consider cathelicidin LL-37, together with GHK-Cu, dihexa acetate, Melanotan II and PEG-MGF, at a meeting to be held before the end of February 2027, on whether to add them to the list of bulk substances pharmacies may use. Advisory committees give non-binding recommendations. [9] This process is not a drug approval. The meaning of the “for research purposes” label: What does research peptide mean?
Sport (WADA)
The WADA list valid from January 1, 2026 does not name LL-37. Class S0 prohibits at all times (in and out of competition) pharmacological substances that are not covered in another section of the list and are not approved by any official health authority for therapeutic use in humans; drugs in clinical development are given as an example of this definition, and the class is defined with examples “including but not limited to”. [11] The most advanced wound study published with LL-37 is at phase 2b [2] and it has no licensed product on the TİTCK list; the classification of a specific substance is within WADA’s authority.
Türkiye
The TİTCK (Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency) Licensed Human Medicinal Products List dated October 16, 2026 contains no product with LL-37 (cathelicidin) as an active substance. [12] Article 19 of Law No. 1262 (İspençiyari ve Tıbbi Müstahzarlar Kanunu) punishes those who manufacture unlicensed preparations and those who knowingly sell, offer for sale or have sold them with imprisonment from one to five years; the same penalty is prescribed for those who sell, market or advertise a product that is not a preparation with the claim that it diagnoses or treats diseases. Importing preparations made abroad without a license for commercial purposes counts as smuggling. [13] Under Article 24 of Law No. 6197, medicines cannot be sold on the internet or in any other electronic medium. [14]
General legal framework of peptides: Are peptides legal? · General risks: Peptide side effects
Evidence table: claim, population and limits
| Claim | Population examined | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Heals chronic wounds | Venous leg ulcer: 34 and 148 patients; diabetic foot: 25 patients | No difference in the whole group in the large study; positive findings from small studies and a subgroup. [1] [2] [3] |
| Strengthens immunity and prevents infection by injection | Wound studies with forms applied to the wound; by injection only a single intratumoral melanoma case | The FDA finds human safety information insufficient. [8] |
| Safe because it is natural | Tissue and blood samples from psoriasis and lupus patients; cell experiments | LL-37 takes part in pathways that feed inflammation and the autoimmune response in these diseases. [4] [5] |
| Protects against cancer | Cell and animal studies; single case report with intratumoral injection | Effect goes both ways depending on tissue; widespread skin reaction was reported with intratumoral use. [6] [7] |
Limits of this guide
This page summarizes published human studies, mechanism research and official agency assessments on LL-37. It gives no dose, cycle, preparation, administration technique or product-sourcing information. Laboratory and animal findings are not evidence of benefit or safety in humans.
What does the evidence say?
What it does and does not affectLimited or insufficient evidence
- DDiabetic foot ulcer — single small studyIn a double-blind study of 25 patients, granulation tissue increased more with LL-37 cream; there was no difference in inflammatory markers and bacterial load.
- DIntratumoral injection into melanoma skin metastasis — single caseIn the single case published from a phase 1 study, injected lesions shrank, but around day 45 widespread skin lesions with atypical cell proliferation developed on the trunk and arms.
What do the A–E grades mean?
The letter describes the strength of evidence for a specific claim, not the size of the benefit or a usage recommendation. E does not mean ineffectiveness has been proven.
- AStrong
- Established physiology (e.g. correcting a deficiency) or strong, consistent, direct human studies
- BModerate
- Supportive human evidence; small effect or some limitations
- CLimited
- A single randomised trial, mixed results or low-certainty human findings
- DInsufficient
- Small, uncontrolled or indirect evidence; not enough to judge
- ENo benefit shown / not studied in humans
- No benefit shown for the claim, or only animal or cell data exist
These grades are Half-Life Journal’s editorial evidence summary; they are not a formal GRADE rating or independent medical approval.
The letter shows evidence strength; it is not a score for positive effect or a usage recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
What is LL-37?
LL-37 is a 37-amino-acid peptide cleaved from the human cathelicidin antimicrobial protein (hCAP18). It is produced naturally in the skin and in immune cells; it plays a role in defense against microbes, in recruiting inflammatory cells and in wound closure.
Does LL-37 speed up wound healing?
Not clearly. In the first study of 34 people, low-concentration LL-37 improved healing indicators in leg ulcers; in a larger phase 2b study of 148 people, no significant difference from placebo was found in the whole patient group. These studies were done with products applied to the wound.
Are there human studies of LL-37 injection?
In all three wound studies, LL-37 was applied to the wound. The FDA writes that it does not have enough safety information to know whether LL-37 would harm humans when given to them. Published human data on injection come from a cancer study in which it was given directly into tumors in melanoma metastases.
Is LL-37 banned in doping control?
The WADA 2026 list does not name LL-37. However, class S0 prohibits at all times pharmacological substances that are not approved by any official health authority for therapeutic use in humans and are not covered in another section of the list; LL-37 has no licensed product on the TİTCK (Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency) list, and the most advanced wound study is at phase 2b.
Is LL-37 legal in Türkiye?
The TİTCK list of licensed products dated October 16, 2026 contains no drug with LL-37. Law No. 1262 attaches sanctions to manufacturing, knowingly selling and commercially importing unlicensed preparations; Law No. 6197 prohibits selling medicines online.
Sources
- RCT Grönberg A et al. — Treatment with LL-37 is safe and effective in enhancing healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Wound Repair Regen) (2014)Back to text ↑
- RCT Mahlapuu M et al. — Evaluation of LL-37 in healing of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: A multicentric prospective randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial (Wound Repair Regen) (2021)Back to text ↑
- RCT Miranda E et al. — Efficacy of LL-37 cream in enhancing healing of diabetic foot ulcer: a randomized double-blind controlled trial (Arch Dermatol Res) (2023)Back to text ↑
- In vitro Lande R et al. — Plasmacytoid dendritic cells sense self-DNA coupled with antimicrobial peptide (Nature) (2007)Back to text ↑
- Human study Lande R et al. — Neutrophils activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells by releasing self-DNA-peptide complexes in systemic lupus erythematosus (Sci Transl Med) (2011)Back to text ↑
- Guideline / review Chen X et al. — Roles and Mechanisms of Human Cathelicidin LL-37 in Cancer (Cell Physiol Biochem) (2018)Back to text ↑
- Human study Dolkar T et al. — Dermatologic toxicity from novel therapy using antimicrobial peptide LL-37 in melanoma: A detailed examination of the clinicopathologic features (J Cutan Pathol) (2018)Back to text ↑
- Institution FDA — Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding that May Present Significant Safety Risks (kategori 2 sayfası; içerik tarihi 22.04.2026) (2026)Back to text ↑
- Institution FDA — Meeting of the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (Şubat 2027 sonundan önce yapılacak toplantı; gündem: katelisidin LL-37 ve diğerleri; içerik tarihi 15.04.2026) (2026)Back to text ↑
- Institution FDA — Uyarı mektubu, MARCS-CMS 594743 (01.04.2020): magistral üretimde LL-37 dahil aday gösterilmemiş peptitler (2020)Back to text ↑
- Institution WADA — 2026 Yasaklılar Listesi (Prohibited List), S0 Onaylanmamış maddeler (2026)Back to text ↑
- Institution TİTCK — Ruhsatlı Beşeri Tıbbi Ürünler Listesi (16.10.2026) (2026)Back to text ↑
- Institution 1262 sayılı İspençiyari ve Tıbbi Müstahzarlar Kanunu (mevzuat.gov.tr, güncel metin) (2025)Back to text ↑
- Institution 6197 sayılı Eczacılar ve Eczaneler Hakkında Kanun (madde 24; 6514 sayılı Kanunla değişik)Back to text ↑
Method: Institutional clinical guidance and relevant studies were compared. Each finding is presented with its population, outcome, sources and limitations. Independent medical review has not yet been completed.
Updated
This content is for information only and is not medical advice. It does not recommend doses, products or vendors. Talk to your clinician before making any health decision.


